USPTO serial 75374765
ENTERPOL
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- KING, ELIZABETH WOOD
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with ENTERPOL?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Vaughan, Ontario, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
BARRY BRETSCHNEIDER
BARRY BRETSCHNEIDER BARRIGAR & MOSS2 ROBERT SPECK PKWY STE 901MISSISSAUGA, ON L4Z 1H8CANADAGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | computer hardware and software applications for the use in all information and data management used in the law enforcement, legal, police and emergency services professions, as well as other dispatch-oriented (ie delivery and transportation related) professions; computer services, namely, custom software application development, consulting, management, installation, deployment and training services; human resource, purchasing and inventory management consulting or information consulting and Internet integration services provided in relation to computer software; alarm tracking, fleet management, integrated geographical mapping, scheduling and case management/investigation service | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 23, 1999 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 13, 1998 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 11, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |