USPTO serial 75375513
COOL TOOLS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BRACEY, KAREN
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with COOL TOOLS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Calgary, Alberta, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
TERESA C TUCKER
TERESA C TUCKER HAYES, SOLOWAY, HENNESSEY, GROSSMAN175 CANAL STMANCHESTER, NH 03101UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | DRILL COLLARS FOR USE IN OIL AND GAS EXPLORATION AND DEVELOPMENT | ACTIVE | — |
| 009 | DOWNHOLE LOGGING AND MEASURING EQUIPMENT, NAMELY, DUAL INDUCTION RESISTIVITY TOOLS, SPECTRAL GAMMARAY TOOLS, BULK AND SPECTRAL LITHO DENSITY TOOLS, MICRODENSITY TOOLS, BOREHOLE CALIPER TOOLS AND BOREHOLE COMPENSATED SONIC TOOLS FOR THE MEASUREMENT AND ANALYSIS OF GEOLOGICAL FORMATIONS; COMPUTER HARDWARE AND SOFTWARE FOR USE IN CAPTURING, PROCESSING, ANALYZING, CHARTING AND STORING DATA IN THE FIELD OF WELL AND GAS EXPLORATION AND INSTRUCTION MANUALS SOLD AS A UNIT | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 14, 2001 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 10, 2000 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 20, 2000 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 19, 2000 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Dec 5, 1999 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 22, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 22, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 23, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 21, 1998 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 19, 1998 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 12, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |