USPTO serial 75375679
MWARE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 608
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- AXILBUND, MELVIN
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with MWARE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Ottawa, Ontario K1P 5H9, CA
Ottawa, Ontario K1P 5H9, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
R TODD PLASKACZ
R TODD PLASKACZ PLASKACZ & ASSOC200 ELGIN ST STE 805OTTAWA, ON K2P 1L5CANADAGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | computer software for creating and manipulating catalog and inventory databases in the field of marketing, and instructional manuals sold as a unit therewith | ACTIVE | Jan 19, 1998 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 17, 2001 | PR.D | PETITION TO REVIVE DISMISSED | — |
| Nov 13, 2000 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 7, 2000 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 1, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 16, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 9, 1999 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| May 13, 1999 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Mar 16, 1999 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Dec 22, 1998 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Nov 20, 1998 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Aug 21, 1998 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 6, 1998 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jul 22, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |