USPTO serial 75375914
TRULOAD
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- RAUEN, JAMES
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with TRULOAD?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Toronto, Ontario, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Marina T. Larson
MARINA T LARSON OPPEDAHL & LARSON LLPP O BOX 5068DILLON, CO 80435-5068UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | reagents and chemicals for use in scientific and medical research | ACTIVE | — |
| 005 | reagents for use in medical diagnostics | ACTIVE | — |
| 009 | electrophoresis systems, namely, electrophoresis apparatus, electrophoresis gel casting apparatus and computer hardware for controlling electrophoresis apparatus, analyzing electrophoresis data and reporting results; disposable components for use with such electrophoresis systems and associated books, guides and manuals sold therewith; computer software for controlling laboratory instruments and electrophoresis systems and for laboratory management, and instructions books, guides and manuals sold therewith | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 7, 2002 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 14, 2001 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jun 12, 2000 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| May 22, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 30, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 13, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 29, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 13, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 13, 1998 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 15, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 11, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 9, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 1, 1998 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |