Drawing for ARKRAY FACTORY

USPTO serial 75375939

ARKRAY FACTORY

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
—
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with ARKRAY FACTORY?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

CURTIS B HAMRE

CURTIS B HAMRE MERCHANT GOULD SMITH EDELL WELTER ET AL3100 NORWEST CTR90 S 7TH STMINNEAPOLIS, MN 55402

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
005Diagnostic multiple reagents for blood analysis, urine analysis and phenolsulfonphthalein test; diagnostic reagents for measuring glucose, glycohaemoglobin, ammonia, ketone-body and glycated albuminACTIVE—
010diagnostic apparatus and parts therefor for blood, urine and breath analysis; diagnostic body fluid osmometers and parts therefor; diagnostic apparatus and parts therefor for phenolsulfonphthalein test and for measuring electrolyte in body fluid, glucose, glycohaemoglobin, ammonia, ketone-body, glycated albumin and salt content of boneACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (ABN6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 29, 2000ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Dec 27, 1999EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Nov 8, 1999EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Jun 18, 1999EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
May 21, 1999EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Dec 8, 1998NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Sep 15, 1998PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Aug 14, 1998NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jun 11, 1998CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jun 9, 1998DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance