Drawing for CONCORD

USPTO serial 75376063

CONCORD

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
ROSSMAN, MARY
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with CONCORD?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

JOHN S EGBERT

JOHN S EGBERT HARRISON & EGBERT1018 PRESTON STE 100HOUSTON, TX 77002UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
025Athletic shoes and sneakersACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Apr 2, 2001ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Mar 30, 2001EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Mar 30, 2001EXPAEX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED—
Nov 27, 2000CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED—
Aug 2, 1999CNCFCONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED—
Jun 2, 1999EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Oct 15, 1998CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Aug 6, 1998CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 3, 1998CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 5, 1998DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance