USPTO serial 75376327
HOMEOPATHICA
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- KREBS, CATHERINE K.
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with HOMEOPATHICA?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Mississauga, Ontario, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
DAVID J PILO
88 DUNN ST STE 301OAKVILLE, ON L6J 3C7CANADAGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | RETAIL, WHOLESALE AND CATALOGUE SERVICES, ALL FEATURING A FULL LINE OF NATURAL COSMETICS AND BEAUTY PRODUCTS NAMELY; BATH AND SHOWER GELS, CREAMS NAMELY; DAY AND NIGHT CREAMS, NECK, HAND, FACE, BODY, BREAST, MASSAGE AND FOOT CREAMS; TONICS, WRINKLE AND EYE CREAM, FACIAL WASH, FACE MASKS, FACIAL PEELS AND STRIPPERS, FACIAL ASTRINGENTS AND CLEANSING EMULSIONS, MAKE-UP REMOVER, MOISTURIZERS AND LOTIONS, OIL AND WAX REMOVERS, BATH OILS, TONERS, DESINCRUSTATION LIQUIDS, CREAMS FOR ASSISTING IN PERMANENT BODY HAIR REMOVAL THROUGH ELECTROLYSIS, FACIAL NEUTRALIZING LIQUID, ELASTIC CREAMS, MAKE-UP FOUNDATION, LIP GLOSS, DEODORANT, MAKE-UP, NAIL CARE; NAMELY, CUTICLE SOFTENER, NAIL HARDENERS; LASH OILS, TANNING LOTIONS, HAIR CARE PRODUCTS; NAMELY, SHAMPOO, CONDITIONERS AND SETTING GELS | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 21, 2000 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 21, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 11, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 9, 1999 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jan 27, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 26, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 24, 1998 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 26, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |