USPTO serial 75376339
CIGARETTE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 614
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- GLEMBOCKI, ERICA
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with CIGARETTE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Los Angeles, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
BRUCE V GRAKAL
BRUCE V GRAKAL LAW OFFICE OF BRUCE V GRAKAL1541 OCEAN AVE STE 200SANTA MONICA, CA 90401UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Musical sound recordings | ACTIVE | — |
| 016 | Printed materials, namely, stickers, posters, calendars, trading cards, catalogs in the field of music and clothing and other items such as sticker, posters, calendars, and trading cards, and informational flyers promoting musical performances, music and clothing and other items such as stickers, posters, calendars and trading cards | ACTIVE | — |
| 025 | Clothing, namely, t-shirts, polo shirts, sweatshirts, jeans, underwear, footwear, headwear and jackets | ACTIVE | — |
| 041 | Entertainment services in the nature of distribution of musical sound recordings and music videos for others | INACTIVE - INSUFFICIENT FEE RECEIVED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 5, 2002 | PETD | PETITION TO REVIVE-DENIED | — |
| Mar 15, 2002 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 15, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 10, 2001 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 26, 2000 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 24, 2000 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 15, 1999 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 6, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 6, 1998 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 16, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |