USPTO serial 75376521
BREAKFAST TOPPERS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- LEHKER, DAWN FELDMAN
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with BREAKFAST TOPPERS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
STEPHEN B SALAI
STEPHEN B SALAI CUMPSTON & SHAW2 STATE ST STE 850ROCHESTER, NY 14614UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 029 | fruit based topping syrup for use on pancakes, waffles, French toast, and the like | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 17, 1999 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Dec 17, 1999 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Aug 25, 1999 | EXFB | EXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF | — |
| Apr 19, 1999 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Feb 1, 1999 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Jan 29, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 29, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 19, 1998 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 6, 1998 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 18, 1998 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 8, 1998 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 23, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |