Drawing for THE KABBALAH CENTRE

USPTO serial 75376580

THE KABBALAH CENTRE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
KREHELY, KIM
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with THE KABBALAH CENTRE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

PETER E NUSSBAUM

PETER E NUSSBAUM WOLFF & SAMSON5 BECKER FARM RDROSELAND, NJ 07068UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
041educational services, namely, providing seminars and courses on religion and spiritualityACTIVEJan 30, 1991

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Aug 3, 2001ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Aug 3, 2001EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Aug 3, 2001EXPAEX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED—
May 30, 2001CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED—
May 23, 2001JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Sep 20, 2000CNCFCONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED—
Jul 26, 2000CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 30, 2000CNCFCONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED—
May 22, 2000JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
May 16, 2000EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Nov 8, 1999CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Aug 16, 1999CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 12, 1999CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 12, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Dec 31, 1998CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 4, 1998CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 4, 1998DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jun 29, 1998CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 26, 1998DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jun 17, 1998DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance