USPTO serial 75376714
SOYLONG
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- KING, LINDA M
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with SOYLONG?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Elk Grove Village, IL
Elk Grove Village, IL
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
LAURA BETH MILLER
LAURA BETH MILLER BRINKS HOFER GILSON & LIONEP O BOX 10395CHICAGO, IL 60610UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 029 | soy based food beverage used as a milk substitute, soy based cheese substitute, soy based yogurt substitute, meat substitute made primarily form soy, chicken substitute made primarily from soy, fish substitute made primarily from soy, soy protein for use as a food additive, soybean extract, formed and/or unformed textured vegetable protein made form soy flour for use as a meat extender or meat substitute, and powdered soy milk | ACTIVE | — |
| 030 | soy based ice cream substitute, and soy based frozen yogurt substitute | ACTIVE | — |
| 031 | nonmedicated soy based protein additives for animal feed | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by EDLONG CORPORATION, THE
- Other trademarks owned by EDLONG CORPORATION, THE
- Other trademarks in Class 029
- Other trademarks in Class 030
- Other trademarks in Class 031
- Similar marks named SOYLONG
- Prosecution event ABN6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 19, 2002 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Sep 7, 2001 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 22, 2001 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Apr 3, 2001 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 23, 2001 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Oct 19, 2000 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 21, 2000 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Apr 4, 2000 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 4, 2000 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Sep 7, 1999 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 28, 1999 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Feb 23, 1999 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Dec 1, 1998 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Oct 30, 1998 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Sep 4, 1998 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 24, 1998 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Aug 21, 1998 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Jul 8, 1998 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 15, 1998 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 26, 1998 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 23, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |