USPTO serial 75376891
COLOUR OF MONEY
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- PENDLETON, CAROLYN A
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with COLOUR OF MONEY?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
London W1P 1LB, GB
London W1P 1LB, GB
LONDON, GB
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
JAY K MEADWAY
LESIA O SKRYPOCZKA AKIN GUMP STRAUSS HAUER & FELD LLPONE COMMERCE SQ STE 22002005 MARKET STPHILADELPHIA, PA 19103Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | computer utility and operating system software and programs; computer software and programs used to track, monitor, audit, support and secure electronic payment systems | ACTIVE | — |
| 036 | financial services, namely electronic payment by means of electronic processing and transmission of bill payment data and providing auditing, electronic security and encryption in relation thereto; financial advisory, consulting and information services | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | consultancy in the field of computer software; updating and maintenance of computer software; design of computer software for others; research in the field of computer software | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by SearchSpace Limited
- Other trademarks owned by SearchSpace Limited
- Other trademarks owned by FORTENT LIMITED
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 036
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named COLOUR OF MONEY
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 20, 2007 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jun 20, 2007 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| May 30, 2007 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| May 2, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 11, 2006 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 11, 2006 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Oct 11, 2006 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jun 28, 2006 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| Jun 28, 2006 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Jun 28, 2006 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 12, 2006 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jun 12, 2006 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| May 11, 2006 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 19, 2006 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 11, 2006 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Oct 11, 2005 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Aug 31, 2005 | ETOP | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE PROCESS - TERMINATED | — |
| May 19, 2005 | ATRQ | ATTORNEY REVIEW/DECISION ON AMENDMENT REQUIRED | — |
| Apr 25, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 2, 2005 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 1, 2005 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jan 12, 2005 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Dec 1, 2004 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Nov 26, 2004 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Nov 24, 2004 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 17, 2004 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Nov 5, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 5, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 12, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 7, 2004 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 23, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jun 25, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 6, 1999 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Sep 13, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 27, 1999 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jul 26, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 8, 1999 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 26, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 26, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 28, 1998 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 23, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |