USPTO serial 75377333
KELPMAN
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- STINE, DAVID
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with KELPMAN?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
AGROCLONAL BIOTECHNOLOGIES INC.
West Vancouver, British Columbia, CA
AGROCLONAL BIOTECHNOLOGIES INC.
West Vancouver, British Columbia, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
James S. Leigh,
JAMES S LEIGH KLARQUIST SPARKMAN CAMPBELL LEIGH ET ALONE WORLD TRADE CTR121 S W SALMON ST 16TH FLPORTLAND, OR 97204-2988Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 025 | clothing, namely jackets, t-shirts, sweatshirts, caps, and children's masquerade costumes | ACTIVE | — |
| 028 | games and playthings, namely balloons and dolls; children's toy gardening tools, pails, shovels and wheel barrows | ACTIVE | — |
| 029 | processed kelp | ACTIVE | — |
| 041 | educational and entertainment services, namely lectures and theatrical presentations featuring ecological, gardening, agricultural and environmental issues; videotape production | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by AGROCLONAL BIOTECHNOLOGIES INC.
- Other trademarks owned by AGROCLONAL BIOTECHNOLOGIES INC.
- Other trademarks in Class 025
- Other trademarks in Class 028
- Other trademarks in Class 029
- Other trademarks in Class 041
- Similar marks named KELPMAN
- Prosecution event ABN6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 13, 2004 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Apr 1, 2004 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 16, 2003 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 8, 2003 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| May 29, 2003 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 10, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 7, 2003 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Oct 8, 2002 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jul 16, 2002 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 26, 2002 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| May 7, 2002 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 8, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 7, 2001 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 14, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 15, 2000 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Nov 14, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 3, 2000 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 6, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 3, 1999 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 22, 1999 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Feb 16, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 13, 1998 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 22, 1998 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 21, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 20, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |