Drawing for ARISTO

USPTO serial 75377583

ARISTO

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 614
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
TINGLEY, JOHN
Law office
PETITIONS OFFICE

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with ARISTO?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

DIANE E TURRIFF

ANDREW P BRIDGES WILSON SONSINI GOODRICH & ROSATI, PC650 PAGE MILL RDPALO ALTO, CA 94304-1050UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Electronic design automation computer software and manuals purchased as a unit, excluding goods and services provided for medical, biomedical, health care, or veterinary applicationsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 27, 2002PETDPETITION TO REVIVE-DENIED—
Nov 26, 2001PINMINCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED—
Mar 5, 2001PETRPETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED—
Dec 30, 2000ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Mar 14, 2000NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jan 27, 2000OP.TOPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999—
Jan 27, 2000OP.DOPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999—
May 10, 1999OP.IOPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999—
Oct 27, 1998ETOFEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED—
Sep 22, 1998PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Aug 21, 1998NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jul 6, 1998CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jun 18, 1998DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance