USPTO serial 75377770
DOCTORS FOR NUTRITION
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 2242232Status 900
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Apr 27, 1999
- Examiner
- KULICK, LIZBETH B
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 106
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with DOCTORS FOR NUTRITION?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
James A. Ullman
JAMES A ULLMAN GREENBERG TRAURIG2375 E CAMELBACK RD STE 700PHOENIX, AZ 85016UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | providing a web site featuring information on nutrition and health | EXPIRED | Dec 2, 1998 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 12, 2009 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Dec 8, 2009 | 8.OK | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED | The USPTO accepted your Section 8 declaration showing the mark is still in use in commerce (or excusable nonuse). This satisfies the six-year maintenance requirement and keeps the registration active until the next renewal deadline. |
| Feb 23, 2005 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 23, 2005 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 23, 2005 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 17, 2004 | 8.AF | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) FILED | — |
| Aug 17, 2004 | ES8R | TEAS SECTION 8 RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 21, 2004 | 8.OK | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED | The USPTO accepted your Section 8 declaration showing the mark is still in use in commerce (or excusable nonuse). This satisfies the six-year maintenance requirement and keeps the registration active until the next renewal deadline. |
| May 11, 2004 | 8.AF | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) FILED | — |
| May 11, 2004 | ES8R | TEAS SECTION 8 RECEIVED | — |
| May 11, 2004 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 7, 2003 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 27, 1999 | R.SR | REGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | Your mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application. |
| Feb 24, 1999 | CNTA | APPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 24, 1999 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Feb 9, 1999 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Feb 3, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 8, 1998 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Dec 8, 1998 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 8, 1998 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 26, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |