USPTO serial 75378142
NANOGEL
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 2694300Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Mar 11, 2003
- Examiner
- DALIER, JOHN DAVID
- Law office
- SCANNING ON DEMAND
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with NANOGEL?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Imperial Chemical Industries, PLC
Millbank, London SW1P 3JF, GB
Imperial Chemical Industries, PLC
Millbank, London SW1P 3JF, GB
Imperial Chemical Industries, PLC
Millbank, London SW1P 3JF, GB
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
H JOHN CAMPAIGN
MARY A MOY LADAS & PARRY26 W 61ST STNEW YORK, NY 10023-7604UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 002 | paints for use on ceramics, enamel for electronic components, for marine use, for office use, for protection against corrosion, for protection against fire, for protection against graffiti, for the aerospace industry, for use in manufacturing, for use in preventing mold, for use in removing mold, for use in the automotive industry, for use in the printing industry, for use on fabric, for exterior or interior use, for use in the home; varnishes, lacquers in the nature of a coating, paint thinners, colorants and color pigments for use in the manufacture of paint varnishes and lacquers; rust preservatives in the nature of a coating and wood preservatives; paint primers; wood stains; mastics; glaziers' putty | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Imperial Chemical Industries, PLC
- Other trademarks owned by Imperial Chemical Industries, PLC
- Other trademarks owned by Imperial Chemical Industries, PLC
- Other trademarks in Class 002
- Similar marks named NANOGEL
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 17, 2009 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Apr 10, 2008 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Sep 20, 2006 | CORV | REVIEW OF CORRESPONDENCE COMPLETE | — |
| Oct 26, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 11, 2003 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Nov 14, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 8, 2002 | 44EA | SEC. 44(E) CLAIM ADDED | — |
| Nov 8, 2002 | 1.BD | Sec. 1(B) CLAIM DELETED | — |
| Oct 21, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 16, 2002 | PCGR | PETITION TO DIRECTOR GRANTED | — |
| Oct 15, 2002 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 21, 2002 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Jun 3, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 1, 2002 | IUCN | NOTICE OF ALLOWANCE CANCELLED | — |
| May 20, 2002 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| May 20, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 1, 2002 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 1, 2001 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Jun 13, 2001 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 1, 2001 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Mar 20, 2001 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Jan 6, 2001 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 1, 2000 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Nov 15, 2000 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Nov 15, 2000 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jul 31, 2000 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 2, 2000 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 1, 2000 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jan 24, 2000 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 1, 1999 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jun 1, 1999 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Mar 9, 1999 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Feb 5, 1999 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Dec 23, 1998 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 23, 1998 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 19, 1998 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 12, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |