USPTO serial 75378154
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Mountain View, CA
Mountain View, CA
Mountain View, CA
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
LAURENCE S RICKLES
LAURENCE S RICKLES JOHNSON & JOHNSON1 JOHNSON & JOHNSON PLZNEW BRUNSWICK, NJ 08933-7001UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 005 | pharmaceutical products, namely, those in specialized dosage forms, namely, transdermal plasters and transdermal patches used in pain relief, treatment of hypogonadism, and smoking cessation; iontophoretic patches for use in pain relief; controlled drug-releasing polymer matrices, for use in treatment of conditions of the oral cavity; and pharmaceutical products in conventional dosage forms, namely, fungicides, for treating oral fungal infections, alkalinizing agents for maintaining alkaline urine, alkalinizing agents for treating acidosis, alkalinizing agents for neutralizing gastric acid, bladder control drugs, anti-cancer drugs, drugs for relieving bladder pain, drugs for treating interstitial cystitis, drugs for reducing toxicity associated with chemotherapy, drugs for treating oral candidiasis, dietary and nutritional supplements, and drugs for use in the field of urology and oncology; and osmotic pumps for use in delivering cough/cold medications and for use in the field of urology and oncology | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
| 010 | implantable drug delivery devices for use in experimental animals and for administering leuprolide in the treatment of prostate cancer | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 24, 2010 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Feb 17, 2004 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Oct 28, 2003 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Sep 29, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 27, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Sep 3, 2003 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jul 10, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 9, 2002 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Jan 31, 2002 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 9, 2002 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jul 27, 2001 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 9, 2001 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jan 9, 2001 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Oct 17, 2000 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 15, 2000 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Aug 17, 2000 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 10, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 10, 2000 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Nov 8, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 6, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 15, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 3, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 26, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 4, 1998 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 25, 1998 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 1, 1998 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 27, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |