Drawing for COMPUTER PHILES

USPTO serial 75378368

COMPUTER PHILES

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 608
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
POWERS, ALEXANDER L
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with COMPUTER PHILES?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

MICHAEL S GREEN

MICHAEL S GREEN MUNGER CHADWICK PLC333 N WILMOT STE 300TUCSON, AZ 85711UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
035computerized word processing preparing advertising, audio visual presentations for othersABANDONEDJan 1, 1994
041computer educational trainingABANDONEDJan 1, 1994
042Computer consulting, diagnostics, preparing web design, desktop publishing, graphic artsABANDONEDJan 1, 1994

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Apr 14, 1999PR.WPETITION TO REVIVE WITHDRAWN—
Feb 10, 1999PETRPETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED—
Jan 20, 1999ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jun 18, 1998CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 12, 1998DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance