Drawing for TEGO

USPTO serial 75378387

TEGO

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 2282594Status 710
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Oct 5, 1999
Examiner
HOWARD, CHERYL L
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 103

What this means

Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.

Status 710: Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active.

Need help with TEGO?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

JEFFREY H KAUFMAN

JEFFREY H. KAUFMAN OBLON SPIVAK MCCLELLAND MAIER & NEUSTADCRYSTAL SQUARE FIVE-FOURTH FLOOR1755 JEFFERSON DAVIS HIGHWAYARLINGTON, VA 22202

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009ELECTRICAL APPARATUS, NAMELY, DATA COMMUNICATING TERMINALS AND NETWORK INTERFACE MODULES FOR MAN-MACHINE DIALOGUE; MOUNTING AND WIRING EQUIPMENT FOR ELECTRICAL INSTALLATIONS, NAMELY, FOR MAN-MACHINE DIALOGUE, ENCLOSURES FOR ELECTRICAL INSTALLATION, NAMELY, FOR MAN-MACHINE DIALOGUE; DIALOGUE DEVICES, NAMELY, OPERATOR TERMINAL OR MAN-MACHINE DIALOGUE; COMPUTER INTERFACE BOARDSSECTION 8 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 8, 2010CAEXCANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9—
Sep 18, 2009CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Apr 16, 2009CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED—
Apr 16, 2009COARTEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED—
Apr 4, 2006C15AREGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK.—
Aug 16, 2005815FREGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) & SEC. 15 FILED—
Aug 16, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Oct 5, 1999R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Jul 13, 1999PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jun 11, 1999NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Mar 30, 1999CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Mar 24, 1999CNEAEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED—
Mar 2, 1999CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 1, 1999ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Feb 3, 1999CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Dec 21, 1998CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 11, 1998CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 28, 1998DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Feb 9, 1998CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance