USPTO serial 75378468
VIEWTEC
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 2424312Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jan 30, 2001
- Examiner
- MERMELSTEIN, DAVID
- Law office
- GENERIC WEB UPDATE
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with VIEWTEC?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Leigh Ann Lindquist
Leigh Ann Lindquist SUGHRUE MION, PLLC2000 PENNSYLVANIA AVE., NW, SUITE 900WASHINGTON, DC 20006UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | COMPUTER SOFTWARE FOR TECHNICAL MULTIMEDIA DOCUMENTS IN THE FIELDS OF THE AERONAUTIC AND DEFENSE INDUSTRIES; AND APPARATUS FOR DISPLAY AND TRANSMISSION OF TECHNICAL MULTIMEDIA DOCUMENTS IN ELECTRONIC FORM, NAMELY, COMPUTER AND VIDEO MONITORS, ELECTRONIC LUMINESCENT DISPLAY PANELS AND COMPUTER TERMINALS, ALL IN THE FIELDS OF THE AERONAUTIC AND DEFENSE INDUSTRIES | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 29, 2021 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Jan 30, 2020 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 19, 2019 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 28, 2011 | RNL1 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| Jan 28, 2011 | 89AG | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED | The USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary. |
| Jan 25, 2011 | E89R | TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 7, 2006 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jun 24, 2006 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Jun 24, 2006 | PLGL | ASSIGNED TO PARALEGAL | — |
| Apr 11, 2006 | 815F | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) & SEC. 15 FILED | — |
| Apr 11, 2006 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 11, 2006 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 11, 2006 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 4, 2003 | AMD7 | SEC 7 REQUEST FILED | — |
| Feb 4, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 23, 2001 | COC. | CORRECTION UNDER SECTION 7 - PROCESSED | — |
| Jun 6, 2001 | PRAN | POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED NO RESPONSE REQUIRED | — |
| May 4, 2001 | AMD7 | SEC 7 REQUEST FILED | — |
| Jan 30, 2001 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Nov 29, 2000 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Nov 29, 2000 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Oct 21, 1999 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| May 13, 1999 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 20, 1999 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 19, 1999 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jan 27, 1999 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 30, 1998 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 3, 1998 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 21, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 27, 1998 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 27, 1998 | 1.BD | Sec. 1(B) CLAIM DELETED | — |