USPTO serial 75378479
NETWATCH
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 601
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- THOMPSON, LAVERNE
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with NETWATCH?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
KEITH A VOGT
KEITH A VOGT NIRO SCAVONE HALLER & NIRO181 W MADISON ST STE 4600CHICAGO, IL 60602UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | computer consulting services, namely, providing on-site and remote maintenance support for local area and wide area computer system networks | ACTIVE | Jan 1, 1991 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 3, 2000 | ABN1 | ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED | — |
| Nov 30, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 22, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 20, 2000 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jun 24, 1999 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jun 1, 1999 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| May 27, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 19, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 18, 1998 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 1, 1998 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 7, 1998 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 30, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 27, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 19, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |