Drawing for CLARION

USPTO serial 75378569

CLARION

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
EDWARDS, ALICIA COLLINS
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with CLARION?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

PETER M BRODY

PETER M BRODY ROPES & GRAY1301 K ST NW STE 800 EWASHINGTON, DC 20005UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
035Business management services for home health care agencies, namely, assisting home health care providers in contracting with managed care payors and administration of said contracts; collections, analysis and reporting of home health care agency data, namely, utilization data and outcome data; marketing, namely, preparing and placing advertisements and developing promotional campaigns on behalf of home health care agencies to payors and consumers; home health care referral services, namely, receiving nursing, therapy and personal care referrals from managed care personnel and forwarding these to home health care agencies for patient servicesACTIVE—
036insurance claims adminstration, namely, submission of claims and obtaining payor verification and authorization of home health care servicesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (ABN6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 28, 2002ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
May 10, 2001EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Apr 30, 2001EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Oct 31, 2000NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Aug 8, 2000PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jul 7, 2000NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Mar 31, 2000CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jan 6, 2000CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 6, 1999CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 2, 1999ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
May 19, 1999CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Apr 16, 1999CNEAEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED—
Oct 27, 1998CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 2, 1998CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 12, 1998DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance