USPTO serial 75378842
PRICE WATERHOUSE C&L
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 601
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BUTLER, CHERYL A
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with PRICE WATERHOUSE C&L?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
JONATHAN D REICHMAN
JONATHAN D REICHMAN KENYON & KENYON1 BROADWAYNEW YORK, NY 10004UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | "ARBITRATION SERVICES; LITIGATION AND DISPUTE SUPPORT SERVICES; INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY CONSULTING AND ADVISORY SERVICES; ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTING SERVICES, NAMELY, DEVELOPING AND IMPLEMENTING PRACTICES, AND REVIEWING STANDARDS FOR THE PURPOSE OF COMPLIANCE WITH ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION LAWS, REGULATIONS AND PROGRAMS; HUMAN RESOURCE CONSULTING SERVICES RELATING TO EQUAL EMPLOYMENT PRACTICES, THE LABOR MARKET AND INTERNATIONAL ASSIGNMENT OF PERSONNEL; AND ADVISORY, CONSULTING, AND INFORMATION SERVICES OFFERED VIA A GLOBAL COMPUTER NETWORK" | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 9, 1998 | ABN1 | ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED | — |
| Apr 20, 1998 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |