Drawing for CLEANSE, BURN, BUILD & BEAUTIFY

USPTO serial 75378934

CLEANSE, BURN, BUILD & BEAUTIFY

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
SHIH, SALLY
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 602: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with CLEANSE, BURN, BUILD & BEAUTIFY?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

SPENCER REESE

SPENCER REESE GRIMES & REESE1270 S WOODRUFF AVEIDAHO FALLS, ID 83404UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
003skin care products, namely, moisturizers, cleansers, toners, anti-aging cream and eye gelACTIVEOct 15, 1996
005vitamins, mineral supplements, and herb supplementsACTIVEOct 15, 1996

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (ABN2): The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 9, 2001ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jul 7, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 17, 2000CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 10, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 2, 2000SUPCSTATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Aug 3, 2000IUAFUSE AMENDMENT FILED—
Apr 11, 2000NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jan 18, 2000PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Dec 17, 1999NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Oct 26, 1999CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Aug 9, 1999CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 4, 1999CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Jan 22, 1999CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 14, 1999CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Dec 7, 1998CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 16, 1998CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 28, 1998DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
May 26, 1998DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
May 26, 1998DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
May 26, 1998DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance