Drawing for COACH NEW YORK

USPTO serial 75379046

COACH NEW YORK

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
BUTLER, CHERYL A
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with COACH NEW YORK?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Jean Clemente

Coach Services, Inc.New York, NY 10001UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
018attache cases, briefcases, portfolios, handbags, purses, shoulder bags, tote bags, key cases and key fobs of leather, men's clutches, wallets, money clips, coin cases, credit card cases, passport covers, cosmetic cases (sold empty), toiletry cases (sold empty), leather identification tags, garment bags, luggage, backpacks, leather tie cases, gym bags, diaper bags, lipstick holdersACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (ARAA): This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 31, 2012ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jul 31, 2012REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Mar 8, 2002ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Apr 23, 2001EX5GSOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED—
Mar 26, 2001EXT5SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED—
Jan 4, 2001EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Oct 5, 2000EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
May 8, 2000EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Mar 11, 2000EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Oct 6, 1999EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Oct 6, 1999EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Apr 30, 1999EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Apr 1, 1999EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Oct 6, 1998NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jul 14, 1998PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jun 12, 1998NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Apr 29, 1998CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Apr 1, 1998CNEAEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance