USPTO serial 75379093
VISTA
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- COHEN, TAMI
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with VISTA?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
JAMES M SLATTERY
JAMES M SLATTERY BIRCH STEWART KOLASCH & BIRCH LLPP O BOX 747FALLS CHURCH, VA 22040-0747UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 021 | glassware, porcelain and earthenware not included in other classes, namely, dishes, tea and coffee cups, non-electric coffee pots and tureens, but excluding floral containers | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 16, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 1, 2000 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Jul 14, 2000 | EXFB | EXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF | — |
| May 2, 2000 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Dec 17, 1999 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Nov 4, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 27, 1999 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Aug 25, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 1, 1999 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 5, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 14, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 14, 1998 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 29, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |