Drawing for CYPRUS CONFERENCE

USPTO serial 75379225

CYPRUS CONFERENCE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 608
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
MAYERSCHOFF, GLENN
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with CYPRUS CONFERENCE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

PATRICIA RANDALL

PATRICIA RANDALL BERLIN HAMILTON & DAHMEN LLP73 TREMONT ST STE 403BOSTON, MA 02108UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
016Brochures, programs, invitational programs, research abstracts, research materials and other related promotional materials for use in connection with educational conference servicesABANDONEDApr 1, 1983
041Educational conference services, including arranging and conducting educational and research related conferences in the field of drug researchABANDONEDApr 1, 1983

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Aug 24, 1999PR.DPETITION TO REVIVE DISMISSED—
May 26, 1999PETRPETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED—
May 26, 1999PETRPETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED—
Oct 30, 1998ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Mar 25, 1998CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 24, 1998DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance