USPTO serial 75379225
CYPRUS CONFERENCE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 608
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MAYERSCHOFF, GLENN
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with CYPRUS CONFERENCE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
PATRICIA RANDALL
PATRICIA RANDALL BERLIN HAMILTON & DAHMEN LLP73 TREMONT ST STE 403BOSTON, MA 02108UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 016 | Brochures, programs, invitational programs, research abstracts, research materials and other related promotional materials for use in connection with educational conference services | ABANDONED | Apr 1, 1983 |
| 041 | Educational conference services, including arranging and conducting educational and research related conferences in the field of drug research | ABANDONED | Apr 1, 1983 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 24, 1999 | PR.D | PETITION TO REVIVE DISMISSED | — |
| May 26, 1999 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| May 26, 1999 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 30, 1998 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 25, 1998 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 24, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |