Drawing for SWINGLAB

USPTO serial 75379460

SWINGLAB

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 2594529Status 713
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Jul 16, 2002
Examiner
SAPPENFIELD, ANN
Law office
TTAB

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with SWINGLAB?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

MICHAEL A GLENN

SwingLab L.L.C.2560 Ninth StreetSuite 121Berkeley, CA 94710

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009golf simulation training aid consisting of a booth with cameras that provide a video image of the trainee on a screen in front of them, as well as an image of a golf pro making a perfect swingSECTION 18 - CANCELLEDJun 1, 1998
041athletic training services, namely, conducting golf classesSECTION 18 - CANCELLEDJun 1, 1998

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 25, 2006C18.CANCELLED SECTION 18-TOTAL—
May 25, 2006CANTCANCELLATION TERMINATED NO. 999999—
May 11, 2006CANGCANCELLATION GRANTED NO. 999999—
Nov 12, 2005PETCCANCELLATION INSTITUTED NO. 999999—
Jul 16, 2002R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Apr 19, 2002CNPRALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED—
Dec 5, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 14, 2001CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 18, 2001REINREINSTATED—
Jul 24, 2000PETRPETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED—
Jun 8, 2000ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Oct 21, 1999CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 30, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jun 22, 1999SUPCSTATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE—
May 24, 1999IUAFUSE AMENDMENT FILED—
Nov 24, 1998NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Sep 1, 1998PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jul 31, 1998NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jun 11, 1998CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jun 9, 1998CNEAEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED—
Mar 30, 1998CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 23, 1998DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance