USPTO serial 75379862
WORLD INFINITY NETWORK
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BRACEY, KAREN
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with WORLD INFINITY NETWORK?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
North Hills, CA
North Hills, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
DONN K HARMS
DONN K HARMS GILLIAM DUNCAN AND HARMS4565 RUFFNER ST STE 200SAN DIEGO, CA 92111UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | Retailing the products of others through multi-level marketing business services | ACTIVE | May 3, 1997 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 1, 2001 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Aug 1, 2001 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Aug 1, 2001 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Feb 10, 2001 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Feb 10, 2001 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jan 16, 2001 | OPPF | OPPOSITION PAPERS RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Dec 19, 2000 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Nov 17, 2000 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Oct 5, 2000 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 10, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 10, 2000 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 13, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 3, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 8, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 2, 1998 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 26, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |