USPTO serial 75380134
WARRIOR
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- HARDY LUDLOW, TARAH KIM
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with WARRIOR?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
MARK A CANTOR
MARK A CANTOR BROOKS & KUSHMAN PC1000 TOWN CTR 22ND FLSOUTHFIELD, MI 48075UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 025 | CLOTHING; NAMELY, TEE SHIRTS, SWEATSHIRTS, SHORTS AND HATS | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 15, 2003 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Mar 21, 2003 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Mar 21, 2003 | EXFB | EXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF | — |
| Mar 3, 2003 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Mar 3, 2003 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Feb 11, 2003 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Dec 16, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 14, 2002 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jun 13, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 22, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 22, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 19, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 7, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 12, 1999 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 4, 1999 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jan 21, 1999 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 22, 1998 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 7, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 2, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |