Drawing for AIV

USPTO serial 75380137

AIV

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 605
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
MCMORROW, JANICE LEE
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with AIV?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

J. Scott Denko

J SCOTT DENKO GEORGE & DONALDSON LLP1100 NORWOOD TWR114 W 7TH STAUSTIN, TX 78701

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Test structure valve used the evaluate, in place, pressure relief valves in liquid and gas petrochemical applicationsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 13, 2001ABN5ABANDONMENT - AFTER PUBLICATION—
May 1, 2001PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Apr 18, 2001NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jan 17, 2001CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jan 17, 2001ZZZYPREVIOUS ACTION COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Jun 12, 2000CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 12, 1999CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 20, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
May 12, 1999CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 8, 1999CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 7, 1998CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 24, 1998DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance