USPTO serial 75380142
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
HOWARD B BARNABY
HOWARD B BARNABY ROBIN BLECKER DALEY & DRISCOLL330 MADISON AVENEW YORK, NY 10017UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Equipment for use in producing haze special effects | ABANDONED | Feb 19, 1998 |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 16, 1999 | ABN1 | ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED | — |
| Jun 11, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 26, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 19, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 17, 1998 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Sep 9, 1998 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Aug 5, 1998 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 30, 1998 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Jul 29, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 24, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |