USPTO serial 75380335
REDHEAD VINEYARD
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Feb 1, 2000
- Examiner
- SLOAN, CYNTHIA
- Law office
- POST REGISTRATION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with REDHEAD VINEYARD?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
SONOMA, CA
SANTA ROSA, CA
St. Helena, CA
St. Helena, CA
ST. HELENA, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Angela C. Wilcox
Angela C. Wilcox Vanek Vickers & Masini111 South Wacker DriveSuite 4050Chicago, IL 60606Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 033 | WINES | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Dec 11, 1996 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by LW WINE PARTNERS, LLC
- Other trademarks owned by EXCHANGE BANK
- Other trademarks owned by FIFE VINEYARDS, LLC.
- Other trademarks owned by FIFE VINEYARDS, LLC.
- Other trademarks owned by FIFE VINEYARDS, LLC.
- Other trademarks in Class 033
- Similar marks named REDHEAD VINEYARD
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 3, 2010 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Jan 6, 2010 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Dec 31, 2009 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Aug 24, 2009 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 24, 2009 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| May 6, 2005 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| May 6, 2005 | PLGL | ASSIGNED TO PARALEGAL | — |
| Apr 18, 2005 | 815F | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) & SEC. 15 FILED | — |
| Apr 18, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 1, 2005 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 1, 2000 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Nov 9, 1999 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Oct 8, 1999 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jul 9, 1999 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 7, 1999 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Apr 19, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 19, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 12, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 21, 1998 | REIN | REINSTATED | — |
| Nov 30, 1998 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 30, 1998 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 26, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |