Drawing for COMMERCIAL TURF PRODUCTS

USPTO serial 75380390

COMMERCIAL TURF PRODUCTS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
OTTE, SARAH
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with COMMERCIAL TURF PRODUCTS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

ROGER D EMERSON

BRUCE E PEACOCK ESQ WEGMAN, HESSLER & VANDERBURG6055 ROCKSIDE WOODS BLVD STE 200CLEVELAND, OH 44131UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
012commercial lawn and garden tractorsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 23, 2005TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Jun 26, 2001EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Dec 28, 2000ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Dec 22, 2000EXPAEX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED—
Jun 12, 2000CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED—
Jan 28, 2000CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 7, 1999JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Dec 7, 1999EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
May 20, 1999CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Feb 22, 1999CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 18, 1998CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 24, 1998DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance