USPTO serial 75380510
COCONUTTY!
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- LOUGHRAN, BARBARA
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with COCONUTTY!?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
ROBERT T JOHNSON JR
ROBERT T JOHNSON JR BELL BOYD & LLCP O BOX 1135CHICAGO, IL 60602UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 030 | cookies | ACTIVE | Apr 13, 1998 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 5, 2001 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Jun 19, 2001 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Jun 19, 2001 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| Mar 5, 2001 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Mar 2, 2001 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Mar 2, 2001 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Nov 17, 1999 | CNRU | DISAPPROVAL - AMENDMENT TO USE MAILED | — |
| Nov 3, 1999 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Oct 15, 1999 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED | — |
| Jul 9, 1999 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Dec 15, 1998 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 16, 1998 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 16, 1998 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 26, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |