USPTO serial 75380757
DINKEL ACKER CD CARL DINKELACKER
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jan 15, 2002
- Examiner
- LORENZO, ROBERT
- Law office
- POST REGISTRATION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with DINKEL ACKER CD CARL DINKELACKER?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Dinkelacker - Schwaben Brau Aktiengesellschaft
D-70178 Stuttgart, DE
Other trademarks owned by Dinkelacker - Schwaben Brau Aktiengesellschaft
Dinkelacker - Schwaben Brau Aktiengesellschaft
D-70178 Stuttgart, DE
Other trademarks owned by Dinkelacker - Schwaben Brau Aktiengesellschaft
Dinkelacker - Schwaben Brau Aktiengesellschaft
D-70178 Stuttgart, DE
Other trademarks owned by Dinkelacker - Schwaben Brau Aktiengesellschaft
Dinkelacker-Schwabenbräu GmbH & Co KG
Stuttgart, DE
Other trademarks owned by Dinkelacker-Schwabenbräu GmbH & Co KG
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Carl Oppedahl
Carl Oppedahl Oppedahl Patent Law Firm LLCP O Box 5940Dillon, CO 80435-5940UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 032 | Beers, low alcohol beers, non-alcoholic beers, [ soft drinks, and beverages containing beer and soft drinks or fruit juices ] | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Dinkelacker - Schwaben Brau Aktiengesellschaft
- Other trademarks owned by Dinkelacker - Schwaben Brau Aktiengesellschaft
- Other trademarks owned by Dinkelacker - Schwaben Brau Aktiengesellschaft
- Other trademarks owned by Dinkelacker-Schwabenbräu GmbH & Co KG
- Other trademarks in Class 032
- Similar marks named DINKEL ACKER CD CARL DINKELACKER
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 17, 2012 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Jun 19, 2010 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 12, 2009 | 8.OK | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED | The USPTO accepted your Section 8 declaration showing the mark is still in use in commerce (or excusable nonuse). This satisfies the six-year maintenance requirement and keeps the registration active until the next renewal deadline. |
| Feb 25, 2009 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Feb 15, 2009 | RRPR | RESPONSE RECEIVED TO POST REG. ACTION | — |
| Feb 15, 2009 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 3, 2008 | PRA8 | POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC. 8 | — |
| Jul 28, 2008 | PLGL | ASSIGNED TO PARALEGAL | — |
| Jul 15, 2008 | ES8R | TEAS SECTION 8 RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 30, 2008 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 30, 2008 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 26, 2007 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jan 15, 2002 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Nov 27, 2001 | 1.BD | Sec. 1(B) CLAIM DELETED | — |
| Sep 6, 2001 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 17, 2001 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Jul 31, 2001 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 4, 2001 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Feb 17, 2001 | IUCN | NOTICE OF ALLOWANCE CANCELLED | — |
| Feb 17, 2001 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Feb 16, 2001 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 8, 2001 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Oct 4, 2000 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 4, 2000 | LEXT | LATE FILED EXTENSION REQUEST | — |
| Aug 17, 2000 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Apr 16, 2000 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 17, 2000 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Aug 17, 1999 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| May 25, 1999 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 23, 1999 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Feb 11, 1999 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 3, 1999 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jan 21, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 8, 1998 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 8, 1998 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 2, 1998 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 27, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |