USPTO serial 75380853
B|BROOKS FINE FLOWERS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Aug 24, 1999
- Examiner
- CARRUTHERS, SUE
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 108
What this means
Status 800 means the registration was renewed after acceptable combined Section 8 and Section 9 filings. The mark remains registered for another 10-year term with active federal protection. Calendar the next Section 8 and 9 deadline in 10 years and maintain monitoring.
Need help with B|BROOKS FINE FLOWERS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
St. Helena, CA
Mount Vernon, WA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Joi A. White
Joi A. White Carr & Ferrell LLP411 Borel Avenue, Suite 603San Mateo, CA 94402UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | Florist Services | ACTIVE | Dec 1, 1997 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 22, 2022 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 22, 2022 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 22, 2022 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 13, 2021 | A7OK | AMENDMENT UNDER SECTION 7 - PROCESSED | — |
| Dec 31, 2020 | EROP | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION-POST REG RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 1, 2020 | PRAM | POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC. 7 | — |
| Jul 1, 2020 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Nov 15, 2019 | WDRL | OTQR WITHDRAWAL FROM PUBLICATION | — |
| Oct 7, 2019 | NA89 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 9 - E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 7, 2019 | RNL2 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (SECOND RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| Oct 7, 2019 | 89AG | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED | The USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary. |
| Oct 7, 2019 | A7OK | AMENDMENT UNDER SECTION 7 - PROCESSED | — |
| Sep 17, 2019 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Aug 6, 2019 | E89R | TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 6, 2019 | ES7R | TEAS SECTION 7 REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 4, 2010 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 23, 2009 | RNL1 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| Sep 23, 2009 | 89AG | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED | The USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary. |
| Aug 25, 2009 | PLGL | ASSIGNED TO PARALEGAL | — |
| Aug 21, 2009 | E89R | TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 23, 2006 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Nov 25, 2005 | 8.OK | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED | The USPTO accepted your Section 8 declaration showing the mark is still in use in commerce (or excusable nonuse). This satisfies the six-year maintenance requirement and keeps the registration active until the next renewal deadline. |
| Oct 26, 2005 | PLGL | ASSIGNED TO PARALEGAL | — |
| Sep 20, 2005 | PLGL | ASSIGNED TO PARALEGAL | — |
| Aug 19, 2005 | 8.AF | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) FILED | — |
| Aug 19, 2005 | 8.AF | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) FILED | — |
| Aug 19, 2005 | 8.AF | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) FILED | — |
| Aug 19, 2005 | ES8R | TEAS SECTION 8 RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 19, 2005 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 2, 2004 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 12, 2002 | CANT | CANCELLATION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Dec 12, 2002 | CAND | CANCELLATION DENIED NO. 999999 | — |
| May 13, 2002 | CANT | CANCELLATION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| May 13, 2002 | CAND | CANCELLATION DENIED NO. 999999 | — |
| Mar 2, 2000 | PETC | CANCELLATION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Aug 24, 1999 | R.SR | REGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | Your mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application. |
| Jun 7, 1999 | CNTA | APPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | — |
| May 24, 1999 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| May 24, 1999 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| May 20, 1999 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Apr 12, 1999 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Feb 26, 1999 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Feb 17, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 17, 1998 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 12, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |