Drawing for BALLPLAY

USPTO serial 75380854

BALLPLAY

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 2346162Status 710
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Apr 25, 2000
Examiner
BUTTERMAN, ALEX
Law office
POST REGISTRATION

What this means

Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.

Status 710: Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active.

Need help with BALLPLAY?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

J. Rick Tache

J. Rick Tache Snell & Wilmer LLP600 Anton BoulevardSuite 1400Costa Mesa, CA 92626

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
028PLAY STRUCTURES INCORPORATING BALLS, PROJECTILE PROPELLING BALLS, STATIONARY AND MOVING TARGETS, CONVEYERS, BUCKETS, BELTS AND VACUUM TUBES FOR TRANSPORTING BALLSSECTION 8 - CANCELLEDSep 1, 1997

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Nov 26, 2010CAEXCANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9—
Sep 9, 2010ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Sep 9, 2010REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Jul 8, 2009ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
Jul 1, 2009ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP—
Apr 11, 2007ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
Jul 31, 20068.OKREGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTEDThe USPTO accepted your Section 8 declaration showing the mark is still in use in commerce (or excusable nonuse). This satisfies the six-year maintenance requirement and keeps the registration active until the next renewal deadline.
Apr 25, 20068.AFREGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) FILED—
Apr 25, 2006ES8RTEAS SECTION 8 RECEIVED—
Apr 25, 2006TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Apr 7, 2006CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Apr 25, 2000R.SRREGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTERYour mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application.
Mar 1, 2000CNTAAPPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER—
Mar 1, 2000IUAAUSE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED—
Oct 28, 1999CNRUDISAPPROVAL - AMENDMENT TO USE MAILED—
Sep 24, 1999AUPCAMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Sep 13, 1999CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 13, 1999IUAFUSE AMENDMENT FILED—
Mar 9, 1999CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Dec 14, 1998CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 10, 1998CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 30, 1998DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 28, 1997UNPRUNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance