USPTO serial 75380854
BALLPLAY
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Apr 25, 2000
- Examiner
- BUTTERMAN, ALEX
- Law office
- POST REGISTRATION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with BALLPLAY?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Interactive FunPlay Products, Inc.
Springfield, IL
Other trademarks owned by Interactive FunPlay Products, Inc.
SPRINGFIELD, IL
ENGLEWOOD, CO
DENVER, CO
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
J. Rick Tache
J. Rick Tache Snell & Wilmer LLP600 Anton BoulevardSuite 1400Costa Mesa, CA 92626Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 028 | PLAY STRUCTURES INCORPORATING BALLS, PROJECTILE PROPELLING BALLS, STATIONARY AND MOVING TARGETS, CONVEYERS, BUCKETS, BELTS AND VACUUM TUBES FOR TRANSPORTING BALLS | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Sep 1, 1997 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Interactive FunPlay Products, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by SCS INTERACTIVE, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by SCS INTERACTIVE, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by 07-12690, INC.
- Other trademarks in Class 028
- Similar marks named BALLPLAY
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 26, 2010 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Sep 9, 2010 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 9, 2010 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 8, 2009 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Jul 1, 2009 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Apr 11, 2007 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Jul 31, 2006 | 8.OK | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED | The USPTO accepted your Section 8 declaration showing the mark is still in use in commerce (or excusable nonuse). This satisfies the six-year maintenance requirement and keeps the registration active until the next renewal deadline. |
| Apr 25, 2006 | 8.AF | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) FILED | — |
| Apr 25, 2006 | ES8R | TEAS SECTION 8 RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 25, 2006 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 7, 2006 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Apr 25, 2000 | R.SR | REGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | Your mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application. |
| Mar 1, 2000 | CNTA | APPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 1, 2000 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Oct 28, 1999 | CNRU | DISAPPROVAL - AMENDMENT TO USE MAILED | — |
| Sep 24, 1999 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Sep 13, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 13, 1999 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Mar 9, 1999 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Dec 14, 1998 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 10, 1998 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 30, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 28, 1997 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |