USPTO serial 75380907
PLACEBO
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- FISHER, HANNAH
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with PLACEBO?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
DAVID M KELLY
DAVID M KELLY FINNEGAN HENDERSON FARABOWGARRETT & DUNNER LLP1300 I ST NWWASHINGTON, DC 20005-3315Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | Cosmetics and personal care products, namely, makeup; eye makeup; makeup removers; creams, lotions, gels, oils, and powders for the body and face; cosmetic pencils; beauty masks; compacts; skin care preparations, namely, anti-wrinkle skin care preparations; nail care preparations; nail polish; lipstick; lip gloss; lip balm; perfume; cologne; artificial eyelashes; skin soaps; personal deodorants; and hair care preparations | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 22, 2003 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Apr 8, 2003 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 15, 2003 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Jan 15, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 2, 2003 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 17, 2002 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Jul 17, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 4, 2002 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 17, 2001 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Jul 19, 2001 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 5, 2001 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jan 18, 2001 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 18, 2001 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jul 18, 2000 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Apr 25, 2000 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 24, 2000 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Dec 29, 1999 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 22, 1999 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jun 24, 1999 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 17, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 17, 1998 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 1, 1998 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 1, 1998 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 25, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |