USPTO serial 75381137
GRAVUAN
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- GILBERT, REBECCA L
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with GRAVUAN?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Shinagawa-ku, Tokyo, JP
Shinagawa-ku, Tokyo, JP
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Robert B. G. Horowitz
Robert B. G. Horowitz Baker & Hostetler LLP45 Rockefeller PlazaNew York, NY 10111UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | computerized printing machine systems comprised of computers, plate making machines, gravure copy machines and photoengraving machines, all sold as a unit | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 19, 2008 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 19, 2008 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 15, 2002 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Sep 28, 2001 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 14, 2001 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Aug 7, 2001 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 29, 2001 | REIN | REINSTATED | — |
| Jun 8, 2001 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Mar 7, 2001 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Nov 30, 2000 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 13, 2000 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Apr 24, 2000 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 1, 2000 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jul 14, 1999 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 14, 1999 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Mar 16, 1999 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Dec 22, 1998 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Nov 20, 1998 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Sep 30, 1998 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 16, 1998 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Aug 7, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |