USPTO serial 75381363
BIG RED MACHINE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BLOHM, LINDA
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with BIG RED MACHINE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
RICHARD B. VERNER
RICHARD B VERNER SULLIVAN & WORCESTER LLP1290 AVE OF THE AMERICASNEW YORK, NY 10104UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 028 | board games and card games, baseball bases, baseball bats, baseball batting gloves, baseball batting tees, baseball gloves, baseball mitts and baseballs | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 19, 2007 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Dec 19, 2007 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Aug 7, 2007 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 30, 2007 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Apr 30, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 19, 2006 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 1, 2006 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Nov 1, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 17, 2006 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 27, 2006 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Apr 27, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 21, 2005 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 1, 2005 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Nov 1, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 16, 2005 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 26, 2005 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Apr 26, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 2, 2004 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Aug 27, 2004 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Aug 27, 2004 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Aug 27, 2004 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Aug 20, 2004 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 31, 2000 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Sep 24, 1998 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 15, 1998 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 14, 1998 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jun 25, 1998 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 24, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 18, 1998 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jun 2, 1998 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 31, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |