USPTO serial 75381376
WELDFAST
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- PACIOUS, JAMES
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with WELDFAST?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
EDWARD D. MURPHY
EDWARD D MURPHY PATENT DEPTTHE BLACK & DECKER CORP701 E JOPPA RDTOWSON, MD 21286Goods and services
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 24, 2003 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jul 17, 2002 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 17, 2002 | REIN | REINSTATED | — |
| Jun 24, 2002 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| May 29, 2002 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| May 29, 2002 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Dec 12, 2001 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 27, 2001 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Sep 6, 2001 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 3, 2001 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Jun 15, 2001 | PETL | COMMUNICATION RECEIVED FROM PETITIONER | — |
| Jun 14, 2001 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Jun 1, 2001 | PINM | INCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED | — |
| Apr 10, 2001 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 14, 2000 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Nov 10, 2000 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 6, 2000 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 24, 2000 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jun 14, 2000 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Dec 14, 1999 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Aug 16, 1999 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 13, 1999 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 11, 1999 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Mar 15, 1999 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 11, 1999 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Feb 16, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 13, 1998 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 28, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |