USPTO serial 75381563
OLD DUTCH APPLE TREE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 2389005Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Sep 26, 2000
- Examiner
- GRAY, CAROLYN
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 111
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with OLD DUTCH APPLE TREE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 032 | apple juice | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Jan 1, 1996 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by OLD DUTCH MUSTARD CO., INC.
- Other trademarks owned by OLD DUTCH MUSTARD CO., INC.
- Other trademarks owned by OLD DUTCH MUSTARD CO., INC.
- Other trademarks in Class 032
- Similar marks named OLD DUTCH APPLE TREE
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 29, 2021 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Sep 26, 2019 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 12, 2012 | NA15 | SEC. 15 ACKNOWLEDGEMENT - E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 12, 2012 | 15AK | REGISTERED - SEC. 15 ACKNOWLEDGED | — |
| Jan 12, 2012 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Nov 16, 2011 | E15R | TEAS SECTION 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 4, 2011 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 20, 2009 | RNL1 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| Oct 20, 2009 | 89AG | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED | The USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary. |
| Oct 15, 2009 | E89R | TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 23, 2006 | 8.OK | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED | The USPTO accepted your Section 8 declaration showing the mark is still in use in commerce (or excusable nonuse). This satisfies the six-year maintenance requirement and keeps the registration active until the next renewal deadline. |
| Sep 22, 2006 | PLGL | ASSIGNED TO PARALEGAL | — |
| Jul 10, 2006 | 8.AF | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) FILED | — |
| Jul 10, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 23, 2006 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jan 23, 2006 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Sep 26, 2000 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jul 4, 2000 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 2, 2000 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Apr 27, 2000 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 25, 2000 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Dec 1, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 23, 1999 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Aug 23, 1999 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 2, 1999 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 19, 1998 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 11, 1998 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 26, 1998 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 20, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |