USPTO serial 75381895
AQUARIUM
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- GAYNOR, BARBARA ANNE
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with AQUARIUM?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
WILLIAM D. RAMAN
WILLIAM D RAMAN THOMPSON & KNIGHT LLP1200 SAN JACINTO CTR98 SAN JACINTO BLVDAUSTIN, TX 78701-4081Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | Restaurant and bar services | ACTIVE | Oct 5, 1998 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 7, 2009 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Jan 17, 2001 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Jan 2, 2001 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Aug 28, 2000 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Jul 14, 2000 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| May 16, 2000 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Apr 7, 2000 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Dec 22, 1999 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 13, 1999 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Dec 13, 1999 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Dec 13, 1999 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| May 13, 1999 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Apr 23, 1999 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Mar 11, 1999 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Feb 4, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 4, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 4, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 4, 1999 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Aug 4, 1998 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 29, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |