USPTO serial 75382339
NEW YORK EYE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- May 23, 2000
- Examiner
- MARTIN, JENNIFER MCGARRY
- Law office
- SCANNING ON DEMAND
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with NEW YORK EYE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Madelyn Shulman
MADELYN SPATT SHULMAN MADELYN SPATT SHULMAN PC3000 MARCUS AVE STE 1E5LAKE SUCCESS, NY 11042-1004UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | EYEGLASS FRAMES, SUNGLASSES, GLASSES AND RELATED EYEGLASS ACCESSORIES, NAMELY EYEGLASS CASES, EYEGLASS CHAINS, STRAPS OR EYEGLASS CORDS AND EYEGLASS FLOATS (ie DEVICES ATTACHED TO THE SIDE OF THE FRAME TO AID IN FLOATATION) | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | May 12, 1998 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 24, 2010 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Mar 20, 2006 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Mar 3, 2006 | 8.OK | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED | The USPTO accepted your Section 8 declaration showing the mark is still in use in commerce (or excusable nonuse). This satisfies the six-year maintenance requirement and keeps the registration active until the next renewal deadline. |
| Mar 3, 2006 | PLGL | ASSIGNED TO PARALEGAL | — |
| Jan 14, 2006 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 2, 2006 | 8.AF | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) FILED | — |
| Jan 2, 2006 | ES8R | TEAS SECTION 8 RECEIVED | — |
| May 23, 2000 | R.SR | REGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | Your mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application. |
| Jan 27, 2000 | CNTA | APPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 27, 2000 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Sep 30, 1999 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Aug 4, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 4, 1999 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Feb 4, 1999 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Dec 3, 1998 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 17, 1998 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 7, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |