USPTO serial 75382710
PRIMEPLUS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- ALVES, RICHARD
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with PRIMEPLUS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
JAMES HARDIE & COY. PTY. LIMITED
Camellia, New South Wales 2142, AU
JAMES HARDIE & COY. PTY. LIMITED
Camellia, New South Wales 2142, AU
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
WILLIAM G LANE
Lisa Shereen Zamaludin Slates Harwell, LLP1700 Pacific AvenueSuite 3800DALLAS, TX 75201Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 002 | PRIMER PAINT FOR FIBER-CEMENT BUILDING PRODUCTS | ACTIVE | Nov 1, 1997 |
| 007 | PRIMER SYSTEM FOR APPLYING PRIMER PAINT TO FIBER-CEMENT BUILDING PRODUCTS, COMPRISING PRIMER PAINT FOR FIBER-CEMENT BUILDING PRODUCTS, A POWER- OPERATED SPRAY APPLICATOR TO APPLY THE PRIMER PAINT TO THE FIBER-CEMENT BUILDING PRODUCTS, AN AIR KNIFE TO REMOVE EXCESS PRIMER PAINT FROM THE FIBER-CEMENT BUILDING PRODUCTS, AND A DRYER TO UNIFORMLY DRY THE APPLIED PRIMER PAINT ON THE FIBER-CEMENT BUILDING PRODUCTS | ACTIVE | Nov 1, 1997 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 15, 2013 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 17, 2001 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 26, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 20, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 7, 2001 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Feb 7, 2001 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 13, 2000 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Dec 13, 2000 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jul 11, 2000 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Apr 18, 2000 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 17, 2000 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jan 12, 2000 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 7, 2000 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Dec 15, 1999 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Jun 4, 1999 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 15, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 14, 1998 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 30, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |