USPTO serial 75382964
KAVASUTRA
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- KING, LINDA M
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with KAVASUTRA?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
San Francisco, CA
San Francisco, CA
San Francisco, CA
San Francisco, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
DAVID E NEWHOUSE
DAVID E NEWHOUSE NEWHOUSE & ASSOCTWIN OAKS OFFICE PLZ STE 112477 8TH AVESAN MATEO, CA 94402-1854Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 032 | Herbal extracts and concentrates used in the preparation of soft drinks both carbonated and non-carbonated; and soft drinks made from such extracts or concentrates | ABANDONED | Oct 1, 1997 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Andrew Hines Miller
- Other trademarks owned by Nigel Edward Lucas
- Other trademarks owned by Daniel Anson Ginsburg
- Other trademarks owned by Christopher Cleon Webb
- Other trademarks in Class 032
- Similar marks named KAVASUTRA
- Prosecution event ABN2 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 19, 1999 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 11, 1998 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 9, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 9, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 1, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |