Drawing for AALBORG KEYSTONE

USPTO serial 75383531

AALBORG KEYSTONE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
CHOSID, ROBIN S
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with AALBORG KEYSTONE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

JOHN J DEVENNY

JOHN J DEVENNY FROSS ZELNICK LEHRMAN & ZISSU PC866 UNITED NATIONS PLZNEW YORK, NY 10017UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Boiler control apparatus, namely, process controllers; boiler control instruments; gas-flue controllers and computer programs for gas-flue analysisACTIVE—
011steam boilers; marine boilers; hot water boilers; thermal oil boilers; industrial boilers; boiler pipes; boiler tubes; boiled feed water installations; boiler fuel feed installations; heat exchangers for oil, water and steam cooling, heating and evaporation; filters for boilers sold as part of boiler installations; flue-gas filters sold as part of boiler installationACTIVE—
037boiler services, namely, building, installation, maintenance and repairACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (ABN6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 10, 2004ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jul 26, 2004CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Jan 20, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jan 16, 2004EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Jan 16, 2004EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Aug 7, 2003EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Jul 10, 2003EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Jul 10, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Apr 9, 2003EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Jan 13, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jan 9, 2003EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Jul 16, 2002NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Apr 23, 2002PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Apr 3, 2002NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Dec 20, 2001CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Oct 1, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 1, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 29, 2001CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 10, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
May 5, 2000CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 5, 1999CNCFCONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED—
Sep 1, 1999CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 1, 1999CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 15, 1999CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 17, 1998CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 8, 1998DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance