USPTO serial 75383835
COSMOPOLITAN
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SOMERVILLE, ARETHA CHARESE
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with COSMOPOLITAN?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
JAY H BEGLER
JAY H BEGLER HARRIS BEACH & WILCOX LLP530 5TH AVENEW YORK, NY 10036UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | Personal care and grooming products, namely, skin, hand, facial and body cleansers, creams lotions; body and face dusting and bath powders; hair shampoo and conditioners; body shampoo; hair rinses; hair spray; non-medicated lip balms and skin balms; bubble baths; bath oil; bath and beauty soaps; suntan lotions and oils; sunblocks and sunscreens preparations; cosmetics, namely, facial foundation makeup in powdered, cream and liquid form, liquid makeup, lipsticks, face powders, skin blemish concealing sticks, lip pencils, highlighter creams, powders, eye shadows in pressed power, cream and pencil forms, eye liner pencils, and eyebrow pencils, mascaras and pre-moistened cosmetic wipes | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 1, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 23, 2004 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 17, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jun 26, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 18, 2003 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 17, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 17, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 3, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 12, 1999 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 20, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 31, 1998 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 29, 1998 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 22, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 8, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 4, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |