USPTO serial 75384068
VIA VOICE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 601
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- DELANEY, ZHALEH SYBIL
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with VIA VOICE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Erika S. Koster
ERIKA S KOSTER OPPENHEIMER WOLFF & DONNELLY LLPSTE 3300 - PLZ VII45 S SEVENTH STMINNEAPOLIS, MN 55402-1609Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 039 | TRANSPORTATION RESERVATION SERVICES UTILIZING AA INTERACTIVE VOICE RESERVATION SYSTEM ALLOWING TRAVELERS TO CHANGE OR PLAN TRIPS | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | PROVIDING AN INTERACTIVE, VOICE-ACTIVATED COMPUTER DATA BASE IN THE FIELD OF TRAVEL ALLOWING TRAVELERS TO CHANGE THEIR TRAVEL RESERVATIONS OR PLAN TRIPS | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 10, 2001 | ABN1 | ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED | — |
| Dec 29, 2000 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Sep 20, 2000 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Mar 9, 2000 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Feb 5, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 13, 1999 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 22, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 21, 1998 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 8, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 19, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 11, 1998 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |